Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a defensive code to ignore checking parts with transitioned objects #18973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

vadmeste
Copy link
Member

@vadmeste vadmeste commented Feb 5, 2024

Community Contribution License

All community contributions in this pull request are licensed to the project maintainers
under the terms of the Apache 2 license.
By creating this pull request I represent that I have the right to license the
contributions to the project maintainers under the Apache 2 license.

Description

Though dataErrs are nil with transitioned objects, add a more defensive code
to ignore counting missing parts in that case

Motivation and Context

How to test this PR?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Fixes a regression (If yes, please add commit-id or PR # here)
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Internal documentation updated
  • Create a documentation update request here

Though dataErrs are nil with transitioned objects, add a more defensive
code to ignore counting missing parts in that case
@harshavardhana harshavardhana merged commit ba975ca into minio:master Feb 5, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants