Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove Uri_services/Uri_services_full for a registry package #74

Open
dsheets opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Remove Uri_services/Uri_services_full for a registry package #74

dsheets opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
2.0

Comments

@dsheets
Copy link
Member

dsheets commented May 12, 2015

We should have separate packages for http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml and http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml.
@dsheets dsheets added this to the 2.0 milestone May 12, 2015
dsheets added a commit to dsheets/ocaml-dns that referenced this issue May 12, 2015
@dsheets
Parse named services; require uri.services_full
9e2277e 
Fixes mirage#67. A new dependency on uri was added. mirage/ocaml-uri#74 tracks specific
packages for the IANA registries.
This was referenced May 12, 2015
Closed
Closed
@avsm
Copy link
Member

avsm commented May 12, 2015

Could this remain backwards compatible for a few releases to avoid a constraint split on uri.1.9.0?

@dsheets
Copy link
Member Author

dsheets commented May 12, 2015

This breaking change will occur in 2.0 which isn't scheduled yet. 1.9 is the next release imminently.

@dsheets
Copy link
Member Author

dsheets commented May 12, 2015

In fact, 1.9 will (finally) expose the uri.services_full findlib package and Uri_services_full module companions to the uri.services package and Uri_services module.

@avsm
Copy link
Member

avsm commented May 12, 2015

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@avsm @dsheets