fix: make the parameter shift example compatible with latest tq #192
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[minor] remove pulse/hardware folder
|
Hi Zhaoyilunnn， Thanks a lot for your contribution! PR Merged. Create q_device in forward() function now is the recommended usage. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, thanks for the great work
I tried to run the parameter shift example but find the code is a bit out of date. I applied some small fixes to make it work with latest torchquantum.
SethLayer0is not in the__all__dict and needs to be imported fromtorchquantum.layer.layersq_devicerequires the batch size as an input, so it is dynamically created inforward()to avoid shape mismatch error.Thanks,
Yilun