Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skins 16/64 samplers :: re-sync skin.xml & skin_settings #2218

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 31, 2019

Conversation

ronso0
Copy link
Member

@ronso0 ronso0 commented Jul 30, 2019

skin.xml in both Deere's and Tango's 16/64 samplers versions have diverged, probably after merging 2.2 into master (I'm too lazy to investigate..)

discovered while fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1837716

IIRC this is not the first time, and fixing those screw-ups is tedious.
Can we somehow exclude /res/skins when any other mixxx branch is merged into master?
Obviously, this should be decided per merge, as for example lib-redesign conatins fundamental skin changes, but skin fixes in 2.2 are not relevant for master AFAICT because skins in master are usually fine.
or: can /res/skins/ be excluded as soon as merge conflicts in skins pop up?

@daschuer
Copy link
Member

Thank you for fixing this.
Skins are not special compared to other code. More difficult are IMHO ui files, because QtDesigners sometimes moves blocks around, which tricks git.

I think we need help from the original contributor if skin conflicts have evolved to do it right.
This should happen only if skin changes have been made an old version branch.
Excluding them does not really help.

An other issue can be pending PRs with conflicts to master.

@daschuer
Copy link
Member

I can confirm that the issue is fixed. Thank you. LGTM.

@daschuer daschuer merged commit 017cd04 into mixxxdj:master Jul 31, 2019
@ronso0 ronso0 deleted the deere16/64-tango-fixes branch August 16, 2019 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants