Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Join Gnome Circle #101

Open
daniarla opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Join Gnome Circle #101

daniarla opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@daniarla
Copy link

daniarla commented Feb 7, 2022

First of all, I'm not related to the Gnome project in any way (except using Gnome as my daily driver).

Recently, I leaned about Gnome Circle -> https://circle.gnome.org/
And as I found that your software is super useful and adds a lot to the functionality of Gnome, I think it deserves the attention that the initiative could give it.

I'm not sure if you were already aware of this but I just wanted to make sure you wont miss it.

@mjakeman
Copy link
Owner

mjakeman commented Feb 8, 2022

Great idea. I've been thinking about this quite a bit.

Having a look at the criteria, extension-manager does meet all of the points. And with the new app icon in #84 we'll have a nice gnome-style icon as well.

If you have a look at the upstream issue for extension installation, there's been a bit of talk about improving the installation experience for sandboxed browsers, and what role Extension Manager will play in this compared with the official Extensions app.

The consensus seems to be that the official app will pick up support for sandboxed installation, likely using a URL scheme (which Extension Manager will also adopt), and that Extension Manager can fill in a more advanced role for "power users", which fits in nicely with other feature requests like Lists (#75).

On that basis, I think applying for Circle is a sensible next step. I was initially planning on waiting for 1.0 to apply, but given that we've already met the criteria, I think I'll look into it now for the next release.

@daniarla
Copy link
Author

daniarla commented Feb 8, 2022

That's good to know! I wanted to make sure that you were aware of that possibility, as I only learned about it recently after a couple of years using Gnome.
You are doing an awesome job with the extension!

@mjakeman mjakeman added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed needs info Further information is requested labels Feb 10, 2022
@needlesslygrim
Copy link
Contributor

I took the liberty of filling out the application form as best I could. Here's as far as I got:

- Project name: Extension Manager
- Development site / code repository address: https://github.com/mjakeman/extension-manager 
- Project license: GPLv3
- How to contact the project:  GitHub issues?
- Flathub page*: https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.mattjakeman.ExtensionManager
- Installation instructions:
- Main dependencies and/or runtime: org.gnome.Platform/x86_64/41

@mjakeman mjakeman self-assigned this Feb 23, 2022
@mjakeman
Copy link
Owner

mjakeman commented Mar 15, 2022

Let's apply once 0.3 beta is released.

All basic functionality should be in-place by then and it would meet all the requirements of GNOME Circle. That'll roughly be after we support comments (#4 MR #100), updating (#16 MR #119), and error checking (#65 MR #123).

@mjakeman
Copy link
Owner

I've applied for inclusion in GNOME Circle: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Circle/-/issues/114

@julianfairfax
Copy link

In addition to joining Circle, it would also be nice if the app's code were moved to GNOME World. GitHub is not an open source platform, and being owned by Microsoft makes it more of a danger to open source projects, rather than a help.

@mjakeman mjakeman removed the needs info Further information is requested label Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants