-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PART1] Add pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor
#4577
Conversation
pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor.pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor.
pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor.pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor
pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavorpip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor
pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavorpip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor
@dbczumar Can we split this PR into two? PR1 updates:
PR2 updates:
|
merged_conda_deps = _union_lists(shap_conda_deps, model_conda_deps) | ||
merged_pip_deps = _union_lists(shap_pip_deps, model_pip_deps) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Used _union_lists
here to preserve the item order and make the outcome deterministic & predictable.
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
pip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavorpip_requirements
and extra_pip_requirements
to all flavors except xgboost flavor
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM once MLeap has been reverted (#4577 (comment)). Thanks @harupy !
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
@dbczumar Thanks! |
Signed-off-by: harupy 17039389+harupy@users.noreply.github.com
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Add
pip_requirements
andextra_pip_requirements
to the following flavors:How is this patch tested?
Unit tests
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change?
log_model
andsave_model
supportpip_requirements
andadditional_pip_requirements
for directly specifying pip requirements of the model.What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?
Components
area/artifacts
: Artifact stores and artifact loggingarea/build
: Build and test infrastructure for MLflowarea/docs
: MLflow documentation pagesarea/examples
: Example codearea/model-registry
: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registryarea/models
: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavorsarea/projects
: MLproject format, project running backendsarea/scoring
: Local serving, model deployment tools, spark UDFsarea/server-infra
: MLflow server, JavaScript dev serverarea/tracking
: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologgingInterface
area/uiux
: Front-end, user experience, JavaScript, plottingarea/docker
: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Modelsarea/sqlalchemy
: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registryarea/windows
: Windows supportLanguage
language/r
: R APIs and clientslanguage/java
: Java APIs and clientslanguage/new
: Proposals for new client languagesIntegrations
integrations/azure
: Azure and Azure ML integrationsintegrations/sagemaker
: SageMaker integrationsintegrations/databricks
: Databricks integrationsHow should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:
rn/breaking-change
- The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" sectionrn/none
- No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" sectionrn/feature
- A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notesrn/bug-fix
- A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notesrn/documentation
- A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes