Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSYNC only will it work #35

Open
shift838 opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

CSYNC only will it work #35

shift838 opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@shift838
Copy link

I have an old computer that has CSYNC, Red, Green, Blue and ground.

Will this work for a system that only has a CSYNC line?

@mlorenzati
Copy link
Owner

mlorenzati commented Aug 31, 2023

Hi @shift838, short answer is yes, since the code is prepared to use HSYNC line to manage CSYNC when VSYNC is grounded.
The double click is that not all CSYNCs are the same, example wise I know it works with SEGA and AMIGA CSYNC, but Sinclair + uses inverter polarity for vertical inside the CSYNC.
The next step is to test it, and if it does not work we need to add a config option to invert VSYNC polarity triggering inside CSYNC.

@shift838
Copy link
Author

shift838 commented Sep 1, 2023

Is the latest gerbers the Beta3? Also it seems the wm8213 IC it is designed for is obsolete and so is the alternate WM8199.

Is there another one that can be used on this board?

@mlorenzati
Copy link
Owner

mlorenzati commented Sep 2, 2023 via email

@shift838
Copy link
Author

shift838 commented Sep 2, 2023

Also it seems the wm8213 IC it is designed for is obsolete and so is the alternate WM8199. Is there another IC that can be used on this board to replace it?

@mlorenzati
Copy link
Owner

mlorenzati commented Sep 2, 2023 via email

@mwedmark
Copy link

AD9826 seem to be very similar, still available pretty cheap but also "on the way out". Maybe worth trying out?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants