Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docker hosts compatibility #17570

Closed
mitar opened this issue Oct 31, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Docker hosts compatibility #17570

mitar opened this issue Oct 31, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
area/networking kind/enhancement Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance.

Comments

@mitar
Copy link

mitar commented Oct 31, 2015

As commented here for new Docker networking features.

I am using docker-hosts which does something similar by adding custom entries for each container into the /etc/hosts. What I like there is that I am able to define both the short name, but also full domain name, so service hello would be available as hello, but also as hello.example.com. So could you add a feature where we could define a domain to be appended to the service? This then allows easier migration from external to internal services and back.

@thaJeztah thaJeztah added kind/enhancement Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance. area/networking labels Nov 1, 2015
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

For docker 1.9.x we're in feature freeze, but I'll cc the network team for thoughts, thanks for suggesting!

/cc @mavenugo @mrjana

@mitar
Copy link
Author

mitar commented Nov 29, 2015

It seems that docker-hosts works again with Docker 1.8 and you can mount a volume over /etc/hosts correctly. I have not tested it with 1.9 though.

@calavera
Copy link
Contributor

calavera commented Mar 3, 2016

Thanks for opening this issue. I'm going to close it since we cannot guarantee how tools that have not been updated in almost two years can work with modern versions of docker.

@calavera calavera closed this as completed Mar 3, 2016
@Fredjet
Copy link

Fredjet commented Mar 3, 2016

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a temporary error. The following address(es) deferred:

fredjet15@gmail.com
Domain ventureacceleration.com has exceeded the max emails per hour (55/50 (110%)) allowed. Message will be reattempted later

------- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Received: from github-smtp2-ext5.iad.github.net ([192.30.252.196]:48261 helo=github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net)
by eaglepeak.ovasp.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.86_1)
(envelope-from noreply@github.com)
id 1abd13-0000aB-2Q
for fred@ventureacceleration.com; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:50:45 -0500
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:50:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1457049004;
bh=Y/O77RQ8CS3laQE4FijBOykwHux/kDaoEdugtydJB/4=;
h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=IxRiAnqyYu4pqNFvmmKq4m17NIG7WFiI8pCxCMyeF6qy9QgYNaSw7EWQvqWi7mwd+
mvm1Id3Z8IdXdev7zsQKe2YPF4nIDrEj4TUmpmnu3TcSuOuBaNBILYYCKH36rssj/S
Zndhsz/Zxk/5BhhY9VbkxmxEqrylJhmbBp1G4zp0=
From: David Calavera notifications@github.com
Reply-To: docker/docker reply@reply.github.com
To: docker/docker docker@noreply.github.com
Message-ID: docker/docker/issues/17570/192024955@github.com
In-Reply-To: docker/docker/issues/17570@github.com
References: docker/docker/issues/17570@github.com
Subject: Re: [docker] Docker hosts compatibility (#17570)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_56d8cdacb242b_55263fad595eb2bc76735";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: calavera
X-GitHub-Recipient: Fredjet
List-ID: docker/docker <docker.docker.github.com>
List-Archive: https://github.com/docker/docker
List-Post: mailto:reply@reply.github.com
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:unsub+0007d412684d69aefa7f902f72511a9d441d19707f02179692cf0000000112f08fac92a169ce06d20176@reply.github.com,
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAfUEo79qB1BMGN-1g3Egx9SSh_c36qrks5pp3OsgaJpZM4GZjF3
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: fred@ventureacceleration.com

----==_mimepart_56d8cdacb242b_55263fad595eb2bc76735
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for opening this issue. I'm going to close it since we cannot guarantee how tools that have not been updated in almost two years can work with modern versions of docker.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#17570 (comment)
----==_mimepart_56d8cdacb242b_55263fad595eb2bc76735
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for opening this issue. I'm going to close it since we cannot guarantee how tools that have not been updated in almost two years can work with modern versions of docker.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

----==_mimepart_56d8cdacb242b_55263fad595eb2bc76735--

@Fredjet
Copy link

Fredjet commented Mar 3, 2016

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a temporary error. The following address(es) deferred:

fredjet15@gmail.com
Domain ventureacceleration.com has exceeded the max emails per hour (56/50 (112%)) allowed. Message will be reattempted later

------- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Received: from github-smtp2-ext7.iad.github.net ([192.30.252.198]:48321 helo=github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net)
by eaglepeak.ovasp.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.86_1)
(envelope-from noreply@github.com)
id 1abd13-0000aC-8B
for fred@ventureacceleration.com; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:50:45 -0500
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:50:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1457049004;
bh=nXkOhbTjCqAvumvB/L2bJK6317SqrMBEYpzokcy+Idk=;
h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=K4A2V3hM2bNn+5YcaycWJK4ESq/KcN/HgTIiJLLoBYojUQDkacMVzF8F2Qb8DyHdA
WCX+pcWg7vg2JZor0c/9S8PTlxdui0U8VOoRbYF7FQEPHheyzNkvn8urq6AFVSRTLH
n8haNAAD8AVd9YEHTQgWXnJ7VUKKhqEiypBB6QoI=
From: David Calavera notifications@github.com
Reply-To: docker/docker reply@reply.github.com
To: docker/docker docker@noreply.github.com
Message-ID: docker/docker/issue/17570/issue_event/577062089@github.com
In-Reply-To: docker/docker/issues/17570@github.com
References: docker/docker/issues/17570@github.com
Subject: Re: [docker] Docker hosts compatibility (#17570)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_56d8cdace2469_594b3ff6028bd2a01159cc";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: calavera
X-GitHub-Recipient: Fredjet
List-ID: docker/docker <docker.docker.github.com>
List-Archive: https://github.com/docker/docker
List-Post: mailto:reply@reply.github.com
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:unsub+0007d412684d69aefa7f902f72511a9d441d19707f02179692cf0000000112f08fac92a169ce06d20176@reply.github.com,
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAfUEo79qB1BMGN-1g3Egx9SSh_c36qrks5pp3OsgaJpZM4GZjF3
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: fred@ventureacceleration.com

----==_mimepart_56d8cdace2469_594b3ff6028bd2a01159cc
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #17570.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#17570 (comment)
----==_mimepart_56d8cdace2469_594b3ff6028bd2a01159cc
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #17570.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

----==_mimepart_56d8cdace2469_594b3ff6028bd2a01159cc--

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/networking kind/enhancement Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants