Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[25.0 backport] ci: Make find for test reports more specific #47471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

vvoland
Copy link
Contributor

@vvoland vvoland commented Feb 29, 2024

Don't use all *.json files blindly, take only these that are likely to be reports from go test.
Also, use find ... -exec instead of piping results to xargs.

(cherry picked from commit e4de4de)

- What I did

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Don't use all `*.json` files blindly, take only these that are likely to
be reports from go test.
Also, use `find ... -exec` instead of piping results to `xargs`.

Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
(cherry picked from commit e4de4de)
Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
@vvoland vvoland added status/2-code-review kind/enhancement Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance. area/testing kind/bugfix PR's that fix bugs labels Feb 29, 2024
@vvoland vvoland added this to the 25.0.4 milestone Feb 29, 2024
@vvoland vvoland self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@thaJeztah thaJeztah merged commit 6d675b4 into moby:25.0 Feb 29, 2024
126 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/testing kind/bugfix PR's that fix bugs kind/enhancement Enhancements are not bugs or new features but can improve usability or performance. status/2-code-review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants