You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rotations need a constructor from Euler angles.
The convention should be an enum offering all possibilities (ZXZ, XYX, YZY, ZYZ, XZX, YXY).
While we're at it, a constructor from Cardan-Tait-Bryan (heading-elevation-bank, yaw-pitch-roll) angles should be provided (again with all conventions XYZ YZX ZXY XZY ZYX YXZ, for which we already have a type).
Beware the Jabberwock! game developers, being confused about geometry, call Cardan-Tait-Bryan angles Euler angles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rotations need a constructor from Euler angles.
The convention should be an enum offering all possibilities (ZXZ, XYX, YZY, ZYZ, XZX, YXY).
While we're at it, a constructor from Cardan-Tait-Bryan (heading-elevation-bank, yaw-pitch-roll) angles should be provided (again with all conventions XYZ YZX ZXY XZY ZYX YXZ, for which we already have a type).
Beware the Jabberwock! game developers, being confused about geometry, call Cardan-Tait-Bryan angles Euler angles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: