-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Appendix D uses notation '\dot{m}' instead of 'm_flow' #2644
Comments
henrikt-ma
added a commit
to henrikt-ma/ModelicaSpecification
that referenced
this issue
Sep 3, 2020
Fixes modelica#2643. Note, however, that the figure will probably need another update when fixing modelica#2644.
HansOlsson
added a commit
to HansOlsson/ModelicaSpecification
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2020
The reason is that it's the sum of mass flow rates that give \dot{m} and the terms are not mass-derivatives. Closes modelica#2644
This comment from #2643 could also be of interest here, quoting @HansOlsson:
|
HansOlsson
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2020
* Change notation for mass flow rate from \dot{m} to \tilde{m}. The reason is that it's the sum of mass flow rates that give \dot{m} and the terms are not mass-derivatives. Closes #2644 Co-authored-by: Henrik Tidefelt <henrikt@wolfram.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Quoting @HansOlsson in #2643:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: