Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Paraphrase complicated negated sentence #2703

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions chapters/overloaded.tex
Expand Up @@ -139,15 +139,15 @@ \section{Overloaded Constructors}\label{overloaded-constructors}
The operator C.'constructor' shall only contain functions that declare
one output component, which shall be of the operator record class C.
\item
For an operator recordclass there shall not exist any potential call
For an operator record class there shall not exist any potential call
that lead to multiple matches in (1) above.
\begin{nonnormative}
How to verify this is not specified.
\end{nonnormative}
\item
For a pair of operator record classes \lstinline!C! and \lstinline!D! and components \lstinline!c! and \lstinline!d!
of these classes both of \lstinline!C.'constructor'(d)! and \lstinline!D.'constructor'(c)!
shall not both be legal.
of these classes, respectively, at most one of \lstinline!C.'constructor'(d)! and \lstinline!D.'constructor'(c)!
shall be legal.
\begin{nonnormative}
Hence, one of the two definitions must be removed.
\end{nonnormative}
Expand Down