You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like stm.py was set up to ignore STM32U59 and STM32U5A prefixes at some point. We are considering using one of these due to their larger 4M flash sizes and I wanted to view their pinouts in my stm_layout_tk tool, so I updated modm-devices on my system but was surprised to see these ones missing. I eventually found where they were being ignored and removed those lines, but then it errors out about missing memory models for the 599/5A9 series so I put those back on ignore. I also noticed that these are listed as 85C parts and there wasn't an 85C entry in the temperature map.
I'm not sure why those MCUs were originally put on ignore, so maybe there's some other reason to blacklist them? I can also try and sort out the missing memory models if you like.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The STM32U5{95, 99, A5, A9} chips were not officially launched a year ago when adding STM32U5 support to modm-devices and there were no datasheets available
(#82 (comment)).
Feel free to remove them from the ignore list and add the memory data!
Let us know if you need further help.
It looks like stm.py was set up to ignore STM32U59 and STM32U5A prefixes at some point. We are considering using one of these due to their larger 4M flash sizes and I wanted to view their pinouts in my stm_layout_tk tool, so I updated modm-devices on my system but was surprised to see these ones missing. I eventually found where they were being ignored and removed those lines, but then it errors out about missing memory models for the 599/5A9 series so I put those back on ignore. I also noticed that these are listed as 85C parts and there wasn't an 85C entry in the temperature map.
This is my diff so far:
I'm not sure why those MCUs were originally put on ignore, so maybe there's some other reason to blacklist them? I can also try and sort out the missing memory models if you like.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: