Add outer constructors for "state" types #41
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When playing around at the REPL, it's nice to not need to specify the type-parameter in state objects. This provides an outer constructor that fills the parameters in from the arguments. One missing case is SmartsParserState, but that seems to be a good case for forcing the user to supply them directly.
mojaie
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When playing around at the REPL, it's nice to not need to specify
the type-parameter in state objects. This provides an outer constructor
that fills the parameters in from the arguments.
One missing case is SmartsParserState, but that seems to be a good case
for forcing the user to supply them directly.