Update Routing.pod #933
Merged
Update Routing.pod #933
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
$t->post_ok('/blackjack')->status_code(200);
The current "under" example in this guide, does not specify a specific status code. So a test like this passes even though the "under" function failed which was not expected (could just be me). I realize I could test the content of the failure but seems useful to check the status codes as well.
I thought it might be useful to show how the failure of the "under" function could be used to return a different status code.
$t->get_ok('/blackjack')->status_code(401);
$t->get_ok('/blackjack' => { 'X-Bender' => 1 })->status_code(200);
|
LGTM 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
$t->post_ok('/blackjack')->status_code(200);The current "under" example in this guide, does not specify a specific status code. So a test like this passes even though the "under" function failed which was not expected (could just be me). I realize I could test the content of the failure but seems useful to check the status codes as well.
I thought it might be useful to show how the failure of the "under" function could be used to return a different status code.