Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft of selective_sweep API #828

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions doc/_toc.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ parts:
- file: short_vignettes/demography_vignettes_intro
- file: short_vignettes/demes_vignette
- file: short_vignettes/demography_debugger_vignette
- caption: Short vignettes - special case models
chapters:
- file: short_vignettes/trackmutationfates
- file: short_vignettes/selective_sweep
- caption: Longer vignettes - exporting data to tskit
chapters:
- file: long_vignettes/tskitconvert_vignette
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ parts:
- file: pages/model_params
- file: pages/regiontypes
- file: pages/tskit_tools
- file: pages/conditional_models
- file: pages/types
- caption: Examples
chapters:
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion doc/misc/changelog.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,7 +17,12 @@ Bug fixes
PR {pr}`845`
PR {pr}`847`

Dependencies
New features

* Add module {mod}`fwdpy11.conditional_models`.
PR {pr}`828`

Deprecations

* Deprecate `fwdpy11.tskit_tools.WrappedTreeSequence`
PR {pr}`841`
Expand Down
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions doc/pages/conditional_models.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
(conditional_models)=

# Module `fwdpy11.conditional_models`

```{eval-rst}
.. automodule:: fwdpy11.conditional_models
:members:
:undoc-members:
.. autofunction:: fwdpy11.conditional_models.track_mutation
.. autofunction:: fwdpy11.conditional_models.selective_sweep
```


152 changes: 152 additions & 0 deletions doc/short_vignettes/selective_sweep.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
---
jupytext:
formats: md:myst
text_representation:
extension: .md
format_name: myst
kernelspec:
display_name: Python 3
language: python
name: python3
---

(selective_sweeps)=

# Selective sweeps

```{code-cell} python
---
tags: ['hide-input']
---

import fwdpy11
import numpy as np
import msprime
```

```{code-cell} python
import fwdpy11.conditional_models
import fwdpy11.tskit_tools
```


```{code-cell} python
---
tags: ['hide-input']
---

def setup(prune_selected=False):
# Dropping mutations requires existing
# ancestry, which we can get either
# from a burn-in or from msprime.
initial_ts = msprime.sim_ancestry(
samples=500,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want samples to equal population_size?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to double-check this.

population_size=500,
recombination_rate=1e-1,
random_seed=43215,
sequence_length=1.0,
)

# Build the pop from msprime output
pop = fwdpy11.DiploidPopulation.create_from_tskit(initial_ts)

# Set up basic model parameters
pdict = {
"recregions": [fwdpy11.PoissonInterval(0, 1, 1e-1)],
# Here, 2 means that fitness is multiplicative
# over 1, 1+hs, 1+2s.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be 1, 1+hs, 1+s or 1, 1+2hs, 1+2s, with h=0.5 meaning additive selection? (maybe I'm getting confused with how it interacts with Multiplicative(2.0)...)

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is always 1+hs, so h changes range as scaling changes. yes, that is likely a sticking point...

"gvalue": fwdpy11.Multiplicative(2.0),
"rates": (0, 0, None),
"prune_selected": False,
"simlen": 200,
}
params = fwdpy11.ModelParams(**pdict)

return pop, params
```

## From a new mutation

```{code-cell} python
ALPHA = 1000.0
```


```{code-cell} python
rng = fwdpy11.GSLrng(12345)
pop, params = setup()
```

```{code-cell} python
mutation_data = fwdpy11.conditional_models.NewMutationParameters(
frequency=fwdpy11.conditional_models.AlleleCount(1),
data=fwdpy11.NewMutationData(effect_size=ALPHA / 2 / pop.N, dominance=1),
position=fwdpy11.conditional_models.PositionRange(left=0.49, right=0.51),
)
```


```{code-cell} python
output = fwdpy11.conditional_models.selective_sweep(
rng,
pop,
params,
mutation_data,
fwdpy11.conditional_models.GlobalFixation()
)
```

```{code-cell} python
assert output.pop.generation == params.simlen
assert pop.generation == 0
```

```{code-cell} python
print(output.pop.mutations[output.index])
```

```{code-cell}
for fixation, time in zip(output.pop.fixations, output.pop.fixation_times):
print(fixation, time)
```

```{code-cell}
FIXATION_TIME = output.pop.fixation_times[0]
```



### Recording the generation when fixation happened

```{code-cell} python
rng = fwdpy11.GSLrng(12345)
```

```{code-cell} python
output = fwdpy11.conditional_models.selective_sweep(
rng,
pop,
params,
mutation_data,
fwdpy11.conditional_models.GlobalFixation(),
sampling_policy=fwdpy11.conditional_models.AncientSamplePolicy.COMPLETION,
)
```

```{code-cell} python
assert len(output.pop.ancient_sample_nodes) == 2 * output.pop.N
assert output.pop.fixation_times[output.index] == FIXATION_TIME
```


```{code-cell} python
node_array = np.array(output.pop.tables.nodes, copy=False)
ancient_sample_node_times = \
node_array["time"][output.pop.ancient_sample_nodes]
assert np.all([ancient_sample_node_times == \
output.pop.fixation_times[output.index]])
```

## From a standing variant

The recipes for a standing variant are identical to those show above, except that one uses {class}`fwdpy11.conditional_models.AlleleCountRange` or {class}`fwdpy11.conditional_models.FrequencyRange` to specify the starting frequencies.
150 changes: 150 additions & 0 deletions doc/short_vignettes/trackmutationfates.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
---
jupytext:
formats: md:myst
text_representation:
extension: .md
format_name: myst
kernelspec:
display_name: Python 3
language: python
name: python3
---

(tracking_mutation_fates)=

# Need title

```{code-cell} python
---
tags: ['hide-input']
---

import fwdpy11
import numpy as np
import msprime
```

```{code-cell} python
import fwdpy11.conditional_models
```


```{code-cell} python
---
tags: ['hide-input']
---

def setup(prune_selected=False):
# Dropping mutations requires existing
# ancestry, which we can get either
# from a burn-in or from msprime.
initial_ts = msprime.sim_ancestry(
samples=500,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

again, will double-check. Some of this is confusion due to the change in defaults to diploidy for sim_ancestry.

population_size=500,
recombination_rate=1e-1,
random_seed=43215,
sequence_length=1.0,
)

# Build the pop from msprime output
pop = fwdpy11.DiploidPopulation.create_from_tskit(initial_ts)

# Set up basic model parameters
pdict = {
"recregions": [fwdpy11.PoissonInterval(0, 1, 1e-1)],
# Here, 2 means that fitness is multiplicative
# over 1, 1+hs, 1+2s.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here?

"gvalue": fwdpy11.Multiplicative(2.0),
"rates": (0, 0, None),
"prune_selected": False,
"simlen": 200,
}
params = fwdpy11.ModelParams(**pdict)

return pop, params
```

## Need title

```{code-cell} python
ALPHA = -10.0
```


```{code-cell} python
rng = fwdpy11.GSLrng(12345)
pop, params = setup()
```

```{code-cell} python
mutation_data = fwdpy11.conditional_models.NewMutationParameters(
frequency=fwdpy11.conditional_models.AlleleCount(1),
data=fwdpy11.NewMutationData(effect_size=ALPHA / 2 / pop.N, dominance=1),
position=fwdpy11.conditional_models.PositionRange(left=0.49, right=0.51),
)
```


```{code-cell} python
output = fwdpy11.conditional_models.track_mutation(
rng,
pop,
params,
mutation_data,
when=3,
until=7,
)
```

When tracking deleterious variants, it is unlikely that they will be around at the end of the simulation:

```{code-cell} python
try:
print(output.pop.mutations[output.index])
except IndexError as _:
print(f"mutation {output.index} is no longer in the population!")
```

### Recording all generations of the mutation's sojourn

So, we've lost all the information about this variant.
That's not so useful.
Let's record all generations of its existence as ancient samples:

```{code-cell} python
rng = fwdpy11.GSLrng(12345)
```

```{code-cell} python
output = fwdpy11.conditional_models.track_mutation(
rng,
pop,
params,
mutation_data,
when=3,
until=7,
sampling_policy=fwdpy11.conditional_models.AncientSamplePolicy.DURATION,
)
```

Now, our mutation is present in nodes in our tree sequence.
Let's try to print it again:

```{code-cell} python
try:
print(output.pop.mutations[output.index])
except IndexError as _:
output.index(f"mutation {output.index} is no longer in the population!")
```

Let's track this variant's frequency at each time point:

```{code-cell}
for time, nodes, _ in output.pop.sample_timepoints(include_alive=False):
print(time, len(nodes))
tree_itr = fwdpy11.TreeIterator(output.pop.tables, nodes)
for tree in tree_itr:
for mutation in tree.mutations():
print(time, tree.leaf_counts(mutation.node), mutation.key)
```