Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grouping classes for DCs #11

Closed
cmungall opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Grouping classes for DCs #11

cmungall opened this issue Mar 13, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

We should manually curate groupings at the level above DC

See for example, subtypes of epilepsy, that should be under DOID:1826 ! epilepsy syndrome

screen shot 2015-03-12 at 9 49 47 pm

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

@sbello is it OK to add xrefs and/or synonyms to DCs in the main omimclusters.obo file?

For example, currently text matching with DO is failing on this case. My lexical reordering doesnt work with compound words. If we add a synonym (or direct xref) this will help:

screen shot 2015-03-17 at 2 39 33 pm

@sbello
Copy link

sbello commented Mar 18, 2015

Yes, xrefs and synonyms are fine.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com
wrote:

@sbello https://github.com/sbello is it OK to add xrefs and/or synonyms
to DCs in the main omimclusters.obo file?

For example, currently text matching with DO is failing on this case. My
lexical reordering doesnt work with compound words. If we add a synonym (or
direct xref) this will help:

[image: screen shot 2015-03-17 at 2 39 33 pm]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/50745/6698150/74541fd4-ccb3-11e4-88c7-3d81bca1e5bf.png


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11 (comment)
.

@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member

This issue was moved to monarch-initiative/monarch-disease-ontology-RETIRED#19

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants