Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Craniometadiaphyseal/craniometaphyseal dysplasia, Schwartz-Lelek syndrome #27

Closed
cmungall opened this issue Apr 6, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Apr 6, 2015

Something happened in the latest build and these became unmerged.

sl

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Apr 6, 2015

I think a simple syn addition to DO will help link things. Presumably metaphyseal=metadiaphyseal?

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Apr 6, 2015

cc @sbello, do we need more DCs here?

this looks complicated based on yr comments:

[Term]
id: OMIM:269300
name: Craniometadiaphyseal Dysplasia; CRMDD
alt_id: OMIM:615118
comment: OMIM obsoleted 615118 and moved this to 269300 then renamed 269300 to what 615118 was called and did not retain as a synonym the old name of 269300. I merged these and swapped the name and synonym to retain the information - smb.
synonym: "Schwartz-Lelek Syndrome" EXACT []
is_a: DC:0000138 ! Disease Cluster

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Apr 6, 2015

Here is unprocessed ORDO just for comparison. I don't really understand the upper classifications. But looking at the leaves, seems they treat cr.metadiaphyseal diff from cr/metaphyseal? Or is this just an artefact of their classification? argh.
foo

@pnrobinson
Copy link
Member

of course, metaphyseal is not in general a synonym of metadiaphyseal, and at least in OMIM the "metadia" variant is taken consistently.

Dr. med. Peter N. Robinson, MSc.
Professor of Medical Genomics
Professor in the Bioinformatics Division of the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science of the Freie Universit�t Berlin
Institut f�r Medizinische Genetik und Humangenetik
Charit� - Universit�tsmedizin Berlin
Augustenburger Platz 1
13353 Berlin
Germany
+4930 450566006
Mobile: 0160 93769872
peter.robinson@charite.de
http://compbio.charite.de
http://www.human-phenotype-ontology.org
Introduction to Bio-Ontologies: http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439836651
I have learned from my mistakes, and I am sure I can repeat them exactly
ORCID ID:http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-9199
Scopus Author ID 7403719646
Appointment request: http://doodle.com/pnrobinson


Von: Chris Mungall [notifications@github.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 6. April 2015 17:59
An: monarch-initiative/human-disease-ontology
Betreff: Re: [human-disease-ontology] Craniometadiaphyseal/craniometaphyseal dysplasia, Schwartz-Lelek syndrome (#27)

I think a simple syn addition to DO will help link things. Presumably metaphyseal=metadiaphyseal?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/27#issuecomment-90124240.

@sbello
Copy link

sbello commented Apr 6, 2015

The OMIM description of 269300 (CRMDD) indicates that this is a distinct
disorder from CMDR (214800):
" Langer et al. (1991) called this condition craniometadiaphyseal
dysplasia, wormian bone type, and distinguished it from craniometaphyseal
dysplasia (see CMDR, 218400 http://www.omim.org/entry/218400). Although
after infancy, the long tubular bones appear the same in both disorders,
the skull changes of CRMDD, e.g., thin bone in the superior part of the
calvaria and prominent wormian bones, are not present in CMDR. The short
tubular bones are strikingly different in the 2 disorders. In infants with
CMDR, the diaphyses of the long tubular bones are sclerotic, but the
modeling is normal."
I think we are okay in terms of the cluster terms. CMDR has 3 types (218400,
123000, 3rd type does not have an OMIM entry) and has a cluster term
(DC:0000507). CRMDD has 1 type and does not have a cluster term.
Sue

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com
wrote:

I think a simple syn addition to DO will help link things. Presumably
metaphyseal=metadiaphyseal?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27 (comment)
.

@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

cmungall commented Apr 6, 2015

Thx. Will file DO ticket

@nicolevasilevsky
Copy link
Member

This issue was moved to monarch-initiative/monarch-disease-ontology-RETIRED#36

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants