Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DEV APPROVED] Reorganise MAS-maintained gems in Gemfile #2028

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 4, 2019

Conversation

malcolmbaig
Copy link
Contributor

Among the ungrouped gems, list the MAS ones separately. This is useful
for identifying which repos need updating when applying a change across
all Frontend dependencies, eg - a Ruby version bump.

Among the ungrouped gems, list the MAS ones separately. This is useful
for identifying which repos need updating when applying a change across
all Frontend dependencies, eg - a Ruby version bump.
Copy link
Contributor

@rnalexander rnalexander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this idea. Go for it!

Copy link
Contributor

@margOnline margOnline left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice idea. Is it worth classifying the mas gems by type e.g. tools? I liked that all the engines were together, but not a blocker.

Among the MAS gems, list tools (engines) and dependencies separately.
Also, move validates_url further up so it's listed alongside other 3rd
party dependencies.
@malcolmbaig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@margOnline Yes, I think it is. Added a commit.

@margOnline margOnline changed the title Reorganise MAS-maintained gems in Gemfile [DEV APPROVED] Reorganise MAS-maintained gems in Gemfile Jan 4, 2019
@malcolmbaig malcolmbaig merged commit 2516155 into master Jan 4, 2019
@malcolmbaig malcolmbaig deleted the mb-reorganise-gemfile branch January 4, 2019 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants