asyncio integration

[asvetlov]

@ajdavis please review

[ajdavis]

@asvetlov this is incredibly exciting! I'll begin a review on Monday & Tuesday but I may not finish before I go on vacation, August 18-24. Is that ok or will it cause any delays for you?

[asvetlov]

That's totally fine but I'll be glad to have quick partial feedback at least.
The most annoying issue is I don't know how avoid tornado install if I need asyncio only best way

[ajdavis]

Can you restore this TODO so I remember to examine it? I'm concerned that if an exception-handler in one Tornado coroutine returns the socket to the pool, another Tornado coroutine that receives the socket will be in the wrong exception-handling context.

[ajdavis]

Gorgeous. I have a few minor quibbles. I expect I'll merge this soon after I return from vacation around August 25. Thanks so much.

[ajdavis]

I've opened issues for everything I need to do once this is merged, you can see them in the list of issues that MOTOR-40 depends on.

Shall I merge this now or is there additional work you'd like to do in your fork before I merge?

Of course, once I merge I invite you to continue fixing anything you'd like to fix, in separate pull requests.

[ajdavis]

Alright, I'm taking it. @asvetlov and @jettify a million thank yous! Please continue work if you need to change anything else.

[asvetlov]

Cool!

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:50 PM A. Jesse Jiryu Davis <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Alright, I'm taking it. @asvetlov https://github.com/asvetlov and
@jettify https://github.com/jettify a million thank yous! Please
continue work if you need to change anything else.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#20 (comment).

Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov