GT-Examples-Roassal2 should not be packaged in GT-Examples

[jecisc]

Because we can use GT without Roassal.

[knosan]

Hi

GT-Examples and GT-Examples-Roassal2 are not loaded in Moose 6.1. So the bug entry should be closed.

The openDev team.

[bergel]

Why this? GT-Examples is not part of Moose anymore? So, this means we should also remove it from Roassal. Can you provide a bit of context.

[Ducasse]

Alex
I do not know. Now keeping obsolete bug entry is not good.
What we checked is that in Pharo 6.1 GT-Example is not loaded.
Then I do not understand why Roassal should be packaged inside GTExample.

BTW: One of these days you should take the time to realise that having multiple packages is NOT complex to manage. Because I do not understand why we have Roassal VW in Moose. I manage all my projects with dependencies and it works and it is simple to do. With git this is even simpler.

Stef

[girba]

I believe there is a confusion here.

GT-Examples-Roassal2 was a package in the first version of GT-Examples (the one that relied on pragma dependencies) to provide extensions in the inspector for visualizing GT-Examples. In the new GTExamples, we now have GToolkit-Examples-Roassal2UI. However, one can load only the engine of examples without this package. In the case of Moose, given that Roassal is available anyway, we load it.