-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Bug 860696: add bt test commands. r=echou #57
Bug 860696: add bt test commands. r=echou #57
Conversation
"'bt remote add [<bd_addr>]':\r\n" | ||
"Add a remote device to the scatternet where the device specified by <bd_addr>\r\n" | ||
"lives and return the address of the newly created device. If <bd_addr> is\r\n" | ||
"omitted, Bluetooth LOCAL address ff:ff:ff:00:00:00 is assumed.\r\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Allowing to specify a <bd_addr> here is kind of misleading because all operations should be limited in the same scatternet now. No matter what address we have here, except those invalid ones, we add a new remote device in current scatternet anyway. So why bother? I'm going to remove it in the next revision.
|
Somehow I can't see your comments. Could you comment directly on https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/platform_external_qemu/pull/57/files ? |
@eric30, Somehow I can't see your comments. Could you comment directly on https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/platform_external_qemu/pull/57/files ? |
|
||
static int | ||
do_bt_remote_remove_device( ControlClient client, struct bt_device_s *dev, | ||
int fatal ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bool would be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bool
is not welcome in *.c.
Rebase and address above review comments. |
Bug 860696: add bt test commands. r=echou
No description provided.