Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Cliquet rationale #39

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 11, 2015
Merged

Cliquet rationale #39

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 11, 2015

Conversation

leplatrem
Copy link
Contributor

...completely removed mentions of Kinto.

Should now be clearer :)

@phrawzty
Copy link
Contributor

I am already looking forward to translating this - it will be an excellent learning opportunity for me, too. 🍰

:url: pourquoi-cliquet
:slug: post-cliquet-rationale
:date: 2015-07-14
:summary: ...
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be the td,dr.

@almet
Copy link
Collaborator

almet commented Jul 30, 2015

Temps de lecture approx: 25mn.

Je trouve l'article très bien, j'ai fait des commentaires pour des petites modifs. Merci :-)

Les choix principaux du protocole concernent surtout :

* **Les resources REST** : Les deux URLs d'une resource, pour la collection
et les instances, acceptent des verbes et des headers précis.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

instances -> enregistrements


En revanche, il est tout à fait possible de bénéficier de tous les aspects
du protocole en utilisant une classe ``Collection`` maison, qui se chargerait
elle de manipuler les relations.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mais dans le cas des relations, nous vous recommanderions plutôt de jeter un œil à Django REST Framework.

Natim added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2015
@Natim Natim merged commit b0f9e9d into master Aug 11, 2015
@Natim Natim deleted the cliquet-rational branch August 11, 2015 07:54
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants