-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PeersNext proposal delivered #7
Comments
@ppapadeas can you update this one? Thanks! :) |
Great to see this ticket. Are there any other Peers-related tickets around? |
Can we add a tag "Peers" on this? |
We are using "Leadership" tag for all issues around leadership bucket in the program, including Council and Peers. |
I updated the issue description to set the goal / success metric, and to give ourselves some defined tasks and deadlines to get this done. If they don't feel right, let me know. More notes from the meeting:
So more questions than answers at this stage, but we will follow up with:
|
Folks, this is my github account. |
We had a follow-up meeting on 06 JUN 2016: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dMMe_2slft2Rk690lOHjP5xdwYlsuajSo-AUW08s6bU/edit# Next Steps:
|
Not sure if this is the best place ... but I will do it anyway. Here are two document links:
|
@ioana-chiorean I am moving this to "in progess" in waffle, because that's what it actually is. Ok? |
I agree! 👍 |
Peers have a weekly meeting, top of their priority list. |
@ioana-chiorean could you update this issue with an estimated timeline for this? |
Not sure if a timeline makes sense here? Since this Wednesday's Peers weekly call we have a list of activities/goals for the second half of 2016. Maybe it makes sense to talk about those in a blog post or so? @ioana-chiorean what do you think? -Henrik |
Yes, that will be a good point! PS: Thanks @MichaelKohler for the ping here and @hmitsch for the proposal. |
What's the status here? Let's move under Blocked/Waiting if that its status. |
This was delayed as we focused on Elections and the transition part. |
@ioana-chiorean do you want to provide an update on where this stands right now? Is there anything we should be doing in Hawaii regarding this? |
@MichaelKohler, we added line #7 ("Decision making process among Council, Program Manager, Peers, and Module Owner") to the Hawaii proposal sheet. Hope the session is going to be selected. |
@hmitsch @ioana-chiorean since that session was really short in Hawaii, what are the next steps? |
We discussed this topic in today's Peers call. It is hard to summarize our conclusion. Main idea: We will get together in about 10 days and brainstorm ways we propose to support the Reps Program as Peers. Stay tuned. |
@MichaelKohler with all the changes that occurred we are still in discussions |
@ioana-chiorean status update here? |
@ioana-chiorean Is this still ongoing? Please leave a comment or this will be closed in 24h |
I think this can be closed, we will create a new issue with learnings from the last All Hands regarding expectations. |
Goal:
Define the role and operational model of Reps Peers in the context of the evolution of the program (RepsNext)
Success:
We have a draft proposal that has buy-in from the Reps Council and the Particiaption team, so that we can make the necessary changes to the Peers structure and start operating in a new model
Related Issues & Links:
Roles:
Owner: @ppapadeas @brianking
Involved: @hmitsch @ioana-chiorean @comzeradd @rosanardila @williamq Regnard
Required:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: