Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

commit to add connected devices #2312

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

commit to add connected devices #2312

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

farhan787
Copy link
Contributor

@vbudhram connected devices table...

@farhan787 farhan787 changed the title initial commit to add connected devices commit to add connected devices Aug 24, 2019
@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vbudhram your review please.

Copy link
Contributor

@vbudhram vbudhram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @farhan787, left a couple comments on things that need to be fixed.

.then(testElementExists(selectors.SECURITY_EVENTS.CONNECTED_DEVICES));
},

'gets at least one connected device': function() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets combine this with the test above and make a new test that logs into 123Done or another client. You should be able to test that the service appears in the connected devices and apps.

@shane-tomlinson
Copy link
Contributor

@vbudhram and @farhan787 - what more needs to happen with this PR to get it merged?

@vbudhram
Copy link
Contributor

vbudhram commented Oct 8, 2019

@shane-tomlinson The only thing that needs to be done are getting the tests updated. @farhan787 was stuck on it and I was going to try and unstick him.

@vbudhram
Copy link
Contributor

vbudhram commented Oct 9, 2019

@farhan787 Please take a look at 7555ba9, this the logic need to correctly unit test security events. You can pull the commit into this PR or as needed.

The main issue I found was that you needed to call the beforeRender function in the beforeEach. I also added some logic to correctly setup the mocks needed to load attached clients. Let me know if that works.

@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

farhan787 commented Oct 9, 2019

The main issue I found was that you needed to call the beforeRender function in the beforeEach.

@vbudhram thanks for helping me out but is it compulsory to call the beforeRender in beforeEach for every unit test file ?

@vbudhram
Copy link
Contributor

vbudhram commented Oct 9, 2019

call the beforeRender in beforeEach for every unit test file?

Yea should be fine since in this case you are explicitly testing logic in the beforeRender.

@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vbudhram could you review it please ?

@shane-tomlinson
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @vbudram - mind reviewing these?

@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

farhan787 commented Dec 14, 2019

@vladikoff why is this closed ?

@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vbudhram could you please look into this, if I should make a new PR for this ? Is there something wrong with this work ?

@vbudhram
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @farhan787 Unfortunately, this feature got pushed to beginning next year. I don't think there is anything else for you to do. Once this year bugs get completed, I will circle back to it.

Thanks again for helping with this!

@farhan787
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vbudhram I'd like to continue working on this, I can ping you in January 2020 and complete this one if that's ok ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants