-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Conversation
@alicoding @cadecairos @gvn @k88hudson @Pomax @simonwex any objections to not caring about node v0.10? |
💥 |
Hm, actually isn't it recommended that we stick to node v0.10? I have found 0.12 to be somewhat buggy, especially with older code... |
Buggy how? |
I already merged it, but I'm happy to back it out too. I guess what this patch does here is just remove CI for node v0.10. I hadn't even considered using node v0.10 for staging, I was planning on using node 0.12 for staging. I looked for some recommendations, and Eran Hammer, former head of Walmart Mobile says 0.10 or iojs. |
one of the major wins here is npm 2.5 -- but that said, I'd also like to know where 0.12 is still considered buggy |
I'm not sure what k88 means by "buggy" but I have run into problems w/ running slightly older code on 0.12 due to API breakages in some of the experimental core node APIs and such, e.g. gulp-community/gulp-less#140. In the case of the Teach site it's actually preferable for us to use a slightly older version of LESS but we can't because it doesn't support 0.12 and, um, my computer has 0.12 on it ... and I'm lazy I guess? |
the older version of less is pretty behind at this point though, 3.x should be 0.12 compatible and have a number of fixes compared to the 2.x version |
No description provided.