New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug 1215226] Don't fail silently when sending emails. #2681
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: I'm pretty sure you don't need the
conn.close()
because it will close automatically when the function ends and things get cleaned up.Other than that, I think this looks good. Depending on what happens next, we might want to create message retrying. If we do that, then we're going to want to keep track of which messages succeeded and which failed. We might find that
.send_messages()
should be in a try/except block so that if we hit a failure, we skip just one message rather than that message and the rest in the list. I don't know offhand, though. I think this is good for now, but we might want to file a followup bug to hone it next week depending on what happens.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've always been told that I shouldn't rely on implicit destruction in Python. I looked into this a bit more and it would probably be fine in this case. I can switch it back.
I definitely agree we should add re-send logic at some point in the stack. I wanted to see what happened with this before we made too many decisions though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I'm r+ on this, but not near a computer to merge it.
Can someone green-button this for me?
On Oct 15, 2015 4:58 PM, "Mike Cooper" notifications@github.com wrote: