-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stricter linting and enforcing #114
Stricter linting and enforcing #114
Conversation
@zaach could you merge this PR too please? Thank you! |
@vladikoff since you're around, could you check this one too please? Thanks. |
@@ -293,6 +293,8 @@ function coerce(k, v, schema, instance) { | |||
v = moment.duration(parseInt(split[0], 10), split[1]).valueOf(); | |||
} | |||
break; | |||
default: | |||
// TODO: Should we throw an exception here? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we can fix that in the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I didn't want to modify the behavior with this commit, I just wanted to set up "protections" for future commits. The fix for the TODO should be done in another later commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Stricter linting and enforcing
Thanks again @vladikoff! |
@madarche no, thank you! 👍 |
No description provided.