Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 15, 2018. It is now read-only.

amo be gone (bug 1042820) #2827

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2015
Merged

amo be gone (bug 1042820) #2827

merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2015

Conversation

eviljeff
Copy link
Member

@eviljeff eviljeff commented Jan 8, 2015

Touch all the files!
note: this was a find/replace so there will probably be some messy import lines. Tests pass and it (trivially) runs though.

@@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ class DELETE_REVIEW(_LOG):
"""Requires review.id and add-on objects."""
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will tidy log.py after, promise 😄

@robhudson
Copy link
Member

Can you rebase so tests can run?

@eviljeff eviljeff force-pushed the amo-be-gone branch 3 times, most recently from 864b355 to a57a007 Compare January 9, 2015 11:12
@robhudson
Copy link
Member

docs/topics/translations.rst has an import amo in it. Actually, there's a few references to amo things that are now in mkt.site in the docs.

LOG_HIDE_DEVELOPER, LOG_KEEP, LOG_REVIEW_QUEUE,
LOG_REVIEW_EMAIL_USER, log)

logger_log = commonware.log.getLogger('z.amo')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

z.mkt for the logger?

@robhudson
Copy link
Member

r+wc. This looks good. Let's merge early so we can get a week of testing on this on -dev.

eviljeff added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2015
@eviljeff eviljeff merged commit ecb150c into mozilla:master Jan 10, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants