Calculating the FOV for the Perspective camera

[Tobiasartz]

Since I have no previous experience with 3D I run in to some problems that might be common knowledge to you 3D pro's ;).
I have a wide variety of scene sizes (800x600, 1200x100 etc.).
What formula can I use to make sure that an object with a z position of 0 and a width and height that is the same as the scene fills up the entire scene.

E.g.: Object Mesh A is 1200x100 and is on Z position 0. The scene is 1200x100 as well. The camera is on z position 1500. What is the FOV to make the object fill the scene?

Something along the line of ((A / B ) * C) is what I'm looking for :D.

Infinite amount of kudos to whoever is brilliant enough to answer my question :)

[WestLangley]

The visible height given the vertical field-of-view vFOV and distance from the camera dist is

height = 2 * Math.tan( ( vFOV / 2 ) ) * dist;

The visible width is

aspect = window_width / window_height;
hFOV = 2 * Math.atan( Math.tan( vFOV / 2 ) * aspect );
width  = 2 * Math.tan( ( hFOV / 2 ) ) * dist;

The field-of-view parameter for the camera in THREE.js is the vertical one.

Use the two sets of equations to calculate the required vFOV twice, and select the larger answer.

[Tobiasartz]

Thank you so much for replying :)
I'm kind of confused though. Where do I get the variable vFOV from?
Is it the height of the object that should be filling the scene?
If so, I'm getting weird numbers ( in the 1000 range ) so how do I translate that to the eventual FOV.

I created a Fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/dmYgr/6/
Can you show me there how to do this?

Agains thank you so much. From your post I can already sense you're more of a genius than me ;)

[WestLangley]

Use the first equation and solve for vFOV, then use that as the fov parameter for the camera.

[Tobiasartz]

My scene is 800 * 600.
The distance of the camera is 1000.

How do I use these numbers in your formula.
I don't know what to fill in in vFOV.

height = 2 * Math.tan( ( vFOV / 2 ) ) * dist; <-- You're telling me to start here, but what number should replace vFOV?

[WestLangley]

Use the first equation and solve for vFOV like so

vFOV = 2 * Math.atan( height / ( 2 * distance ) );

then use that as the fov parameter for the camera.

[Tobiasartz]

var renderWidth = 800;
var renderHeight = 600;
var cameraPosition = 1000;

var vFOV = 2 * Math.atan( renderWidth / ( 2 * cameraPosition ) );
var height = 2 * Math.tan( ( vFOV / 2 ) ) * cameraPosition;
var aspect = renderWidth / renderHeight;
var hFOV = 2 * Math.atan( Math.tan( vFOV / 2 ) * aspect );
var width  = 2 * Math.tan( ( hFOV / 2 ) ) * cameraPosition;

Result:
vFOV = 0.7610127542247298 which is not a valid FOV

var vFOV = 2 * Math.atan( renderHeight / ( 2 * cameraPosition ) );
var height = 2 * Math.tan( ( vFOV / 2 ) ) * cameraPosition;

var aspect = renderWidth / renderHeight;
var hFOV = 2 * Math.atan( Math.tan( vFOV / 2 ) * aspect );
var width  = 2 * Math.tan( ( hFOV / 2 ) ) * cameraPosition;

vFOV = 0.5829135889557342 which is also not a valid FOV

Can you fill in the example for me and show an example that does give a valid FOV number?
The correct number of the above example is somewhere around 37

[WestLangley]

In your fiddle,

height = height of your plane mesh = 500.

distance = camera.z - plane.z = 1000 - 100 = 900.

vFOV = 2 * Math.atan( height / ( 2 * distance ) ) = 0.5419 radians, or 31.04 degrees.

[Tobiasartz]

2 * Math.atan( 500 / ( 2 * 900 ) ) = 0.5418937006768411 according to my browser (google chrome)

[WestLangley]

Sorry, I neglected to show the conversion from radians to degrees. I updated my previous post.

[Tobiasartz]

Thank you SO Much! :D
Hah, it took like 10 replies but it works now :).
Thanks again!

[WestLangley]

@Tobiasartz :-)

[awe-schaffhausen]

West Langley. You are a king. Thank you.

[MatthewRayfield]

This was super helpful !! Thanks @WestLangley !