Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix specs on TruffleRuby 22.0.0.2 #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2022
Merged

Fix specs on TruffleRuby 22.0.0.2 #90

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2022

Conversation

ms-ati
Copy link
Owner

@ms-ati ms-ati commented Apr 11, 2022

Appears that TruffleRuby 22.0.0.2 reports RUBY_VERSION of 3.0.2,
but the observed behavior when we pass a hash final argument to
a method taking splat and double-splat arguments appears to be
the prior behavior of Ruby versions before 3.0.0.

Appears that TruffleRuby 22.0.0.2 reports RUBY_VERSION of 3.0.2,
but the observed behavior when we pass a hash final argument to
a method taking splat and double-splat arguments appears to be
the prior behavior of Ruby versions before 3.0.0.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #90 (e57f533) into main (20ee87f) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #90   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines           94        94           
=========================================
  Hits            94        94           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b99a904...e57f533. Read the comment docs.

@ms-ati ms-ati mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2022
82 tasks
@ms-ati ms-ati merged commit 6af46c5 into main Apr 11, 2022
@ms-ati ms-ati deleted the fix-truffleruby-22 branch April 11, 2022 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant