arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39-samsung-a2015/fortuna/serranove: Add flash LED #317
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
force-pushed
the
rt5033-led
branch
from
71b1f30
to
5117afa
Compare
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
changed the title
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
changed the base branch from
msm8916/6.4-rc4
to
msm8916/6.5-rc4
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
force-pushed
the
rt5033-led
branch
from
9e0f922
to
672ebf9
Compare
The phones listed below have Richteck RT5033 LED, which has GPIO pin configurations similar to SGM3140 Flash LED driver. Add it to the device tree. - Samsung Galaxy A3 2015 - Samsung Galaxy A5 2015 - Samsung Galaxy E5 - Samsung Galaxy E7 - Samsung Galaxy Grand Max Signed-off-by: Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@protonmail.com>
Samsung Galaxy A7 2015 has Richteck RT5033 LED, which has GPIO pin configurations similar to SGM3140 Flash LED driver. Add it to the device tree. Signed-off-by: Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@protonmail.com>
The phones listed below have Richteck RT5033 LED, which has GPIO pin configurations similar to SGM3140 Flash LED driver. Add it to the device tree. - Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 - Samsung Galaxy Core Prime LTE - Samsung Galaxy Grand Prime Signed-off-by: Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@protonmail.com>
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini VE has Richteck RT5033 LED, which has GPIO pin configurations similar to SGM3140 Flash LED driver. Add it to the device tree. Signed-off-by: Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@protonmail.com>
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
force-pushed
the
rt5033-led
branch
from
672ebf9
to
3ce6dfd
Compare
wonderfulShrineMaidenOfParadise
changed the base branch from
msm8916/6.5-rc4
to
msm8916/6.5-rc5
K9100ii
pushed a commit
to K9100ii/msm8916-mainline-linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
We can see that "bswap32: Takes an unsigned 32-bit number in either big- or little-endian format and returns the equivalent number with the same bit width but opposite endianness" in BPF Instruction Set Specification, so it should clear the upper 32 bits in "case 32:" for both BPF_ALU and BPF_ALU64. [root@linux fedora]# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux fedora]# modprobe test_bpf Before: test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) After: test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 4 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 4 PASS Fixes: 4ebf921 ("LoongArch: BPF: Support unconditional bswap instructions") Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
M0Rf30
pushed a commit
to M0Rf30/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
barni2000
pushed a commit
to msm8953-mainline/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.