Add PMI632 PMIC and RGB LED on sdm632-fairphone-fp3 #85
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
z3ntu
force-pushed
the
6.3.0/main-pmi632
branch
from
90fbb12
to
9060b76
Compare
Merged
|
Looks good to me, lgtm. I guess the patches you sent are going to be added in version 6.4? |
|
No, 6.5 probably since merge window for 6.4 is just about to open so it's too late for patches to be applied still. But can we please merge this into our 6.3 branch? |
Document the 8 GPIOs found on PMI632. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Add support for the 8 GPIOs found on PMI632. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Document the availability of an LPG configuration for the PMI632 PMIC in the Qualcomm Light Pulse Generator driver. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
The PMI632 PMIC contains 5 PWM channels, 3 of which can be used for LEDs. For the LED pattern it doesn't have LUT like other PMICs but uses SDAM instead. This is not currently implemented in the driver but since LPG works fine without it, add support for the PMIC now. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
The channel ADC5_USB_IN_V_16 is using 1/16 pre-scaling on at least pm7250b and pmi632. Allow that in the schema. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Document support for the pmi632, often found with the sdm632 SoC. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
The PMI632, commonly found on SoCs with SDM632 has various standard functions like ADC, GPIOs, LPG and more. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
The phone features a notification LED connected to the pmi632. Configure the RGB led found on it. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
z3ntu
force-pushed
the
6.3.0/main-pmi632
branch
from
9060b76
to
c4c5394
Compare
M0Rf30
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2023
commit 745f17a upstream. We got a WARNING in ext4_add_complete_io: ================================================================== WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:231 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: ksoftirqd/10 Tainted: 6.3.0-rc2 #85 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 [ext4] [...] Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_end_bio+0xa8/0x240 [ext4] bio_endio+0x195/0x310 blk_update_request+0x184/0x770 scsi_end_request+0x2f/0x240 scsi_io_completion+0x75/0x450 scsi_finish_command+0xef/0x160 scsi_complete+0xa3/0x180 blk_complete_reqs+0x60/0x80 blk_done_softirq+0x25/0x40 __do_softirq+0x119/0x4c8 run_ksoftirqd+0x42/0x70 smpboot_thread_fn+0x136/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 ----------------------------|---------------------------- mount -o dioread_lock ext4_writepages ext4_do_writepages *if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))* // rsv_blocks is not assigned here mount -o remount,dioread_nolock ext4_journal_start_with_reserve __ext4_journal_start __ext4_journal_start_sb jbd2__journal_start *if (rsv_blocks)* // h_rsv_handle is not initialized here mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode) if (dioread_nolock && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN)) mpd->io_submit.io_end->handle = handle->h_rsv_handle ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN // now io_end->handle is NULL but has EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag scsi_finish_command scsi_io_completion scsi_io_completion_action scsi_end_request blk_update_request req_bio_endio bio_endio bio->bi_end_io > ext4_end_bio ext4_put_io_end_defer ext4_add_complete_io // trigger WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal); The immediate cause of this problem is that ext4_should_dioread_nolock() function returns inconsistent values in the ext4_do_writepages() and mpage_map_one_extent(). There are four conditions in this function that can be changed at mount time to cause this problem. These four conditions can be divided into two categories: (1) journal_data and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL, which can be changed by ioctl (2) DELALLOC and DIOREAD_NOLOCK, which can be changed by remount The two in the first category have been fixed by commit c8585c6 ("ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages") and commit cb85f4d ("ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling EXT4_EXTENTS_FL") respectively. Two cases in the other category have not yet been fixed, and the above issue is caused by this situation. We refer to the fix for the first category, when applying options during remount, we grab s_writepages_rwsem to avoid racing with writepages ops to trigger this problem. Fixes: 6b523df ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524072538.2883391-1-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
M0Rf30
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2024
commit 2acc59d upstream. When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression, there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume. $ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs $prog subvolume create /mnt/data $prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots while true;do $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s) sleep 1s done $ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destination: file logAppend: true path: /mnt/data/mongod.log storage: dbPath: /mnt/data/ lockdep reports: [ 3437.452330] ====================================================== [ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G E [ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] but task is already holding lock: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3437.456553] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3437.457054] -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458779] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.459155] -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460686] notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 3437.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.466957] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.467507] Chain exists of: sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48 [ 3437.467979] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3437.468405] ---- ---- [ 3437.468585] rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] lock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: [ 3437.469838] #0: ffffa0a02ce00a88 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x1e3/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470294] #1: ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.470744] stack backtrace: [ 3437.470922] CPU: 7 PID: 35533 Comm: bcachefs Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 [ 3437.471313] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [ 3437.471694] Call Trace: [ 3437.471795] <TASK> [ 3437.471884] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x90 [ 3437.472035] check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 [ 3437.472202] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.472369] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.472518] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.472683] ? lock_is_held_type+0x97/0x110 [ 3437.472856] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.473025] ? filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473204] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.473380] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.473555] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.473819] ? lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.474002] ? __fget_files+0x2a/0x190 [ 3437.474195] ? __fget_files+0xbc/0x190 [ 3437.474380] ? lock_release+0xc5/0x270 [ 3437.474567] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.474764] ? __pfx_bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [bcachefs] [ 3437.475090] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.475277] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.475454] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.475691] RIP: 0033:0x7f2743c313af ====================================================== In __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create(), we grab s_umount unconditionally and unlock it at the end of the function. There is a comment "why do we need this lock?" about the lock coming from commit 42d2373 ("bcachefs: Snapshot creation, deletion") The reason is that __bch2_ioctl_subvolume_create() calls sync_inodes_sb() which enforce locked s_umount to writeback all dirty nodes before doing snapshot works. Fix it by read locking s_umount for snapshotting only and unlocking s_umount after sync_inodes_sb(). Signed-off-by: Su Yue <glass.su@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
barni2000
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: msm8916-mainline#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See commits for details.
Also sent upstream: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230414-pmi632-v1-0-fe94dc414832@z3ntu.xyz/T/
edit: v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230414-pmi632-v2-0-98bafa909c36@z3ntu.xyz/