You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's suggested to build KIconTheme with BreezeIcons since icon theme works in a different way under Windows. when adding BreezeIcons as a build-time dependency, KIconTheme will help init icon resources and ensure app also find icons from Qt's resource system, so programs can use BreezeIcons as they do under Linux.
Maybe? But might not have time to submit this as a patch right now. Feel free to work on it directly if you plan to do so, and please leave a comment first before you work on this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there a related issue so I can check the details?
I need some help to fix those first.
I'm interested in helping (no promise tho, since my spare time is quite limited recently), but is that issue blocking this issue from fixed? If not, I personally tend to fix this issue first when I got time, then try the symlink one.
BLumia
added a commit
to BLumia/MINGW-packages
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2024
Is there a related issue so I can check the details?
Additionally, I actually didn't even notice the missing icon issue. KDE apps on Windows actually use the BreezeIcon assets embedded in the resource file instead of using the one on-disk. Do you have related screenshots (or other info/resources) to showcase this issue?
Description / Steps to reproduce the issue
There are two issues:
And another issue I haven't figure it out right now:
Expected behavior
kiconthemes is build with BreezeIcons and patched, so KDE apps like Kate can find breeze icons, as lone as they are depend on kiconthemes.
Actual behavior
kiconthemes (currently
ucrt64/mingw-w64-ucrt-x86_64-kiconthemes 6.1.0-1
) is not build with BreezeIcons and not patched.Verification
Windows Version
MINGW64_NT-10.0-22631
MINGW environments affected
Are you willing to submit a PR?
Maybe? But might not have time to submit this as a patch right now. Feel free to work on it directly if you plan to do so, and please leave a comment first before you work on this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: