New packages: pastix4calculix

[3rav]

No description provided.

[Biswa96]

Python2? There are discussions about getting rid of it! The provides should have MINGW_PACKAGE_PREFIX also.

[3rav]

With the another version (I mean 3) I have a bug preventing compilation.

[lazka]

yeah, no more python2 please.

[3rav]

I have this error with python3:

-- Generating done
  CMake Error:
    Running
  
     'D:/a/_temp/msys/msys64/mingw64/bin/ninja.exe' '-C' 'C:/_/mingw-w64-pastix4calculix/src/build-x86_64-w64-mingw32-static' '-t' 'recompact'
  
    failed with:
  
     ninja: error: build.ninja:1842: expected '=', got lexing error
  
    common/z_integer.c" -p s -P common && chmod a-w common/s_integer.c"
  
  
          ^ near here
  
  
  
  CMake Generate step failed.  Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.
  ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
      Aborting...

[Biswa96]

In the patch file, what is wrong with all those memset?

[3rav]

Previously, instead of memset was bzero, I made "pull requests" for this (Kabbone/PaStiX4CalculiX#1) but now I decided that maybe it is better to unify the syntax of the main official version 6.1.0 Pastix: https://gitlab.inria.fr/solverstack/pastix/-/blob/master/order/order_find_supernodes.c

[Biswa96]

Just curious. Why is a forked repository (Kabbone/PaStiX4CalculiX) used instead of actual one (Dhondtguido/PaStiX4CalculiX)?

[3rav]

Dhondtguido/PaStiX4CalculiX requires CUDA but this version does not (Kabbone/PaStiX4CalculiX).
Dhondtguido/PaStiX4CalculiX#1 (comment)

[3rav]

Python2? There are discussions about getting rid of it! The provides should have MINGW_PACKAGE_PREFIX also.

Where can I find this discussion?