Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove post 1.3 and pre-2.0 compatibility checks and tweaks #2581

Closed

Conversation

Jojo-Schmitz
Copy link
Contributor

@Jojo-Schmitz Jojo-Schmitz commented May 2, 2016

There's probably quite a bit more, but these are the most obvious places.
Impoved the error mssage, with a hint where to get 2.0.
Most of the templates and sample scores had been created with a pre2.0 nightly version, so they have been resaved with 2.0.0. They'll most probably need to get updated for 3.0 at some point again.

The mtest files I've all changed to 2.07 using sed

maybe I should have picked 2.06...

Any idea anybody why that 1 remaining mtest fails? And more importantly: how to fix it?

@@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ void Measure::read(XmlReader& e, int staffIdx)
breath->setTrack(e.track());
int tick = e.tick();
breath->read(e);
if (score()->mscVersion() < 205) {
if (score()->mscVersion() <= 206) {
// older scores placed the breath segment right after the chord to which it applies
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the problem is what is described in the comment here. The current selectionfilter13.mscx file was version 200, so it was less 205, it maybe should be renewed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jojo-Schmitz Jojo-Schmitz May 12, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Outch! I thought this would not be any functional change (I apparently read the < as a >, but now I see that it is.
Thanks for catching it

@lasconic
Copy link
Contributor

Quick discussion with Werner. It's better to use 2.06 for tests... Sorry for the late answer.

@Jojo-Schmitz Jojo-Schmitz force-pushed the remove-pre-2.0-stuff branch 3 times, most recently from bb599ac to e2522cf Compare May 12, 2016 15:11
@Jojo-Schmitz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sorry, somehow I once again managed to fat-finger and close this PR. New one at #2598

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants