Update tei.css #939
Merged
Update tei.css #939
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@kepper any chance of reviewing this before next ODD meeting? |
|
I'll see what I can do… |
kepper
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
running it locally seems fine – at least I couldn't find any substantial differences within a reasonable testing time. We do have some font issues, but they are unrelated to this, so I will try to address them separately… Many thanks for updating this, @rettinghaus 👍
ahankinson
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
ahankinson
added
Status: Ready To Merge
|
Looks good to me. Will wait for one of the co-chairs to merge at the ODD meeting unless I hear otherwise. |
musicEnfanthen
removed
the
Status: Ready To Merge
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the used
tei.cssto the version from the latest release.As far as I can see this is basically a clean-up and reorder thing, so this shouldn't hurt. But in any case @kepper should give it a test run.