Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 200 #202

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023
Merged

Fix 200 #202

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 3, 2023

Conversation

2bndy5
Copy link
Member

@2bndy5 2bndy5 commented Jan 3, 2023

A follow up to 7a7a854 that resolves #200 and get the CI passing again.

Comment on lines -450 to +451
else // NETWORK_MORE_FRAGMENTS
if (header->type == NETWORK_LAST_FRAGMENT || header->type == NETWORK_MORE_FRAGMENTS) {
// else if not first fragment
else if (header->type == NETWORK_LAST_FRAGMENT || header->type == NETWORK_MORE_FRAGMENTS) {
Copy link
Member Author

@2bndy5 2bndy5 Jan 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-format had a problem here. I must admit it was a little hard to read myself, so I moved around the comment and let clang-format fix the indentation.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@TMRh20 TMRh20 merged commit 4d0d1ba into master Jan 3, 2023
@2bndy5 2bndy5 deleted the fix-200 branch January 3, 2023 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

nrf_to_nrf.h expected for any nRF5x board in CI
2 participants