Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge local op5 patches #34

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Jun 19, 2018

Conversation

jacobbaungard
Copy link
Contributor

OP5s local repo of livestatus has been out of sync for some time. This pull request is to resync everything, so the two repos are back in sync.

Unfortunately the history is a slightly messy.

Carl Helmertz and others added 21 commits February 6, 2017 09:53
Less code = less complexity.

Signed-off-by: Carl Helmertz <chelmertz@op5.com>
…e-rhel5-support to master

* commit '8370633860b0f348aa5d8ad1fa991c68611c038a':
  spec: Remove RHEL 5 python compatibility
The cucumber test cases were added as part of ci_config.yml file.

MON-9120
…120-separate-cucumber-for-monitor-livestatus to master

merging as it's approved.

* commit 'fa67ea0f2c7421fbee4f0cf41b03620a35bd3588':
  Separate cucumber for monitor/livestatus The cucumber test cases were added as part of ci_config.yml file.
the callback NEBCALLBACK_TIMED_EVENT_DATA is never triggerd anymore (maybe it
should be deprecated or removed), so use schedule_event instead and trigger
a event every second to check if the timeperiod transitions have to be recalculated.
Signed-off-by: Sven Nierlein <Sven.Nierlein@consol.de>
the callback NEBCALLBACK_TIMED_EVENT_DATA is never triggerd anymore (maybe it
should be deprecated or removed), so use schedule_event instead and trigger
a event every second to check if the timeperiod transitions have to be recalculated.
- the underlaying virtual machines will be updated from time to time.
- switch to trusty test vm
…ssh://scm.dev.op5.com:7999/monitor/livestatus into bugfix/schedule-timeperiod-transition-calculations
These are naemon internal variables. Instead we should use the variables
supplied by the event object.

Signed-off-by: Robin Engström <robin.engstrom@op5.com>
…le-timeperiod-transition-calculations to master

* commit '7b2d4e8bc4d86679cf1cedded2c5f9a492b457df':
  module.c: do not use sigrestart or sigshutdown
  travis: do not hardcode precise release
  use schedule_event for calculating timeperiod transitions
  release 1.0.6
  travis: do not hardcode precise release
  use schedule_event for calculating timeperiod transitions
  release 1.0.6
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vestelind <tomas.vestelind@op5.com>
…ild-env to master

* commit 'f4f94e45bbd3e3f28e6361dccb0f79f02facb9a8':
  ci_config: Hardspec public_suffix to get succuessful builds
Newer versions of rack-test requires ruby 2.2, we don’t have that
in EL6.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Sjöholm <asjoholm@op5.com>
…ghtly-problems to master

* commit 'de17089e12757193f740d60f2668aa1835ccad93':
  ci_config: Hardcode rack-test version for testing.
Signed-off-by: Robin Engström <robin.engstrom@op5.com>
…-ruby21-dependency to master

* commit 'd4f1426cb696541d523c8ce53cc1b1330d2ab062':
  ci_config.yml: install poltergeist dependencies manually
…l-issue to master

* commit '123add99c194e0f9f72e293a451c393ea258167c':
  installed libyaml
This merges patches from OP5s local repository, which has become out of
sync with upstream
Copy link
Contributor

@sni sni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me

@jacobbaungard
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobbaungard commented Jun 19, 2018

OK to merge with -ff to avoid having two consecutive merge commits? Seems a bit redundant. (I tested merging with -ff here: https://github.com/jacobbaungard/naemon-livestatus/commits/master)

@sni
Copy link
Contributor

sni commented Jun 19, 2018

whatever makes sense to you, i don't care :-)

@jacobbaungard jacobbaungard merged commit 81c80f6 into naemon:master Jun 19, 2018
@jacobbaungard jacobbaungard deleted the merge_local_op5_patches branch June 20, 2018 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants