Have clicking on annotation search result use the preview action if in edit mode

[scottbell]

Closes #6280

Describe your changes:

Handle edit mode in annotation results.

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• Is this change backwards compatible? For example, developers won't need to change how they are calling the API or how they've extended core plugins such as Tables or Plots.

Author Checklist

• Changes address original issue?
• Tests included and/or updated with changes?
• Command line build passes?
• Has this been smoke tested?
• Testing instructions included in associated issue OR is this a dependency/testcase change?

Reviewer Checklist

• Changes appear to address issue?
• Reviewer has tested changes by following the provided instructions?
• Changes appear not to be breaking changes?
• Appropriate automated tests included?
• Code style and in-line documentation are appropriate?
• Has associated issue been labelled unverified? (only applicable if this PR closes the issue)
• Has associated issue been labelled bug? (only applicable if this PR is for a bug fix)

[scottbell]

Note, I ran the unit tests 30 times in parallel with the search suite enabled and didn't get any test failures. Hopefully that persists!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6331 (de59372) into master (6d62e0e) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6331      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.02%   54.97%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         607      607              
  Lines       26235    26242       +7     
  Branches     2395     2397       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        14437    14427      -10     
- Misses      11133    11148      +15     
- Partials      665      667       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
e2e-ci	39.44% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1fde129
e2e-full	51.19% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1fde129
e2e-stable	54.05% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit	49.62% <0.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ui/layout/search/AnnotationSearchResult.vue	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ui/layout/search/ObjectSearchResult.vue	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
example/generator/SinewaveStalenessProvider.js	84.31% <0.00%> (-1.97%)	⬇️
...c/plugins/persistence/couch/CouchObjectProvider.js	45.23% <0.00%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
src/plugins/gauge/components/Gauge.vue	62.04% <0.00%> (-0.61%)	⬇️
src/plugins/plot/chart/MctChart.vue	46.81% <0.00%> (-0.50%)	⬇️
src/plugins/imagery/components/ImageryView.vue	44.21% <0.00%> (-0.43%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6d62e0e...de59372. Read the comment docs.

[ozyx]

Looks good overall! Tested with both object and annotation search results and it worked well. I've left just a couple comments. We might be able to add e2e test coverage for this fairly easily so as not to be blocked by the ongoing unit test router flake issue (😔)

[ozyx]

LGTM!