Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Code resolution for issue-888: dswx-validator report auditing feature #899

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

Code resolution for issue-888: dswx-validator report auditing feature #899

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

riverma
Copy link
Collaborator

@riverma riverma commented Jul 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Purpose

  • Validator script changes to add post-generation CMR check for validating all DSWx-S1 tiles have been produced

Proposed Changes

  • [CHANGE] Validator script, README

Issues

Testing

  • Local testing
  • Tested validation for anomalous and nominal conditions (see README.md Usage section for details)

@riverma riverma self-assigned this Jul 2, 2024
@riverma riverma added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 2, 2024
@riverma riverma marked this pull request as draft July 2, 2024 22:18
@hhlee445 hhlee445 added the pcm.r03-dswx-s1 PCM Release 3 - DSWx-S1 label Jul 3, 2024
@riverma riverma marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 19:32
@hhlee445 hhlee445 merged commit 5fe6ec4 into develop Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hhlee445 hhlee445 hhlee445 approved these changes

@LalaP LalaP Awaiting requested review from LalaP

@chrisjrd chrisjrd Awaiting requested review from chrisjrd

@sjlewis-jpl sjlewis-jpl Awaiting requested review from sjlewis-jpl

Assignees

@riverma riverma

Labels
enhancement New feature or request pcm.r03-dswx-s1 PCM Release 3 - DSWx-S1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@riverma @hhlee445