[FIXED] JetStream pull based message delivery could drop responses. #2166
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…se responses. For internal callbacks we can not rely on the GW routed reply tracking since internal clients can change who receives vs sends response. Signed-off-by: Derek Collison <derek@nats.io>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GW Routed replies by default pin the map to the destination client connection. For internal callbacks, especially ones that use different internal clients for receiving versus sending the response we would not properly track these routed replies. If proper interest arrived after the request it could be lost.
Signed-off-by: Derek Collison derek@nats.io
/cc @nats-io/core