Fix license file

[roncli]

The license file in the root directory got cut off at the top, so I can't tell what license is used (I'm guessing LGPL 2.1, but I'm no license expert). :)

[markheath]

good spot. It was originally LGPL, but some changes from @ioctlLR mean that we could possibly switch to something like MIT which would be nice. @ioctlLR can you confirm?

[ioctlLR]

That is correct. The only derived code is from a MIT licensed source (see LayerDecoderBase.cs and LayerIIIDecoder.cs for details), and the rest is mine or yours. I was thinking MSPL, but MIT works. Dual with LGPL is also fine, if you'd like.

…

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 16:34 Mark Heath ***@***.***> wrote: good spot. It was originally LGPL, but some changes from @ioctlLR <https://github.com/ioctlLR> mean that we could possibly switch to something like MIT which would be nice. @ioctlLR <https://github.com/ioctlLR> can you confirm? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABtk7slOiaGj2TzQ7NYxbPrOsBx6Uo1xks5tirBigaJpZM4S9q25> .

[markheath]

I think MIT would be a good choice. Seems like that's what Microsoft are using themselves now in preference to MSPL. Not sure there's much point dual licensing as it just adds to confusion.

If you're OK with it, I'll switch to MIT

[ioctlLR]

Go for it. :)

…

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 13:11 Mark Heath ***@***.***> wrote: I think MIT would be a good choice. Seems like that's what Microsoft are using themselves now in preference to MSPL. Not sure there's much point dual licensing as it just adds to confusion. If you're OK with it, I'll switch to MIT — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABtk7j_Kdx7gj7e4bgBcN2g-njDcKQfEks5tj8bmgaJpZM4S9q25> .

[markheath]

done :)