Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Porting of Provider Network Model #724

Closed
ChrisDeh opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1144
Closed

Porting of Provider Network Model #724

ChrisDeh opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1144
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new or enhanced functionality to the application
Milestone

Comments

@ChrisDeh
Copy link

Environment

  • Python version: v3.7
  • Nautobot version: v1.0.3

Proposed Functionality

Implementation of Provider Networks as a Model to connect multiple circuits to as done in NetBox: netbox-community/netbox#5986

Use Case

Documentation of e.G. Transit Connections, Peering LANs, MPLS Networks with P2MP Connections, etc.

Database Changes

  • Adding a new table.
  • extending circuit termination

External Dependencies

None

@glennmatthews glennmatthews added status: under review type: feature Introduction of new or enhanced functionality to the application labels Jul 21, 2021
@ChrisDeh
Copy link
Author

Shall i submit a PR for implementation of this?

@glennmatthews
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for offering! If you're willing to do so, it would be quite welcome. :-)

@chadell
Copy link
Contributor

chadell commented Nov 18, 2021

We could also enrich a bit more the original Netbox Model, for instance adding a reference to IPAM Prefixes (optional) could help to model some Provider Networks.

@chadell
Copy link
Contributor

chadell commented Dec 3, 2021

@ChrisDeh have you started with this effort? Definitely, this is something we want to add to Nautobot, so we would like to push it forward.

@glennmatthews , taking as reference the current implementation in Netbox for ProviderNetwork, I would like to ask you if it would make sense to you if we add an extra ManyToMany relationship with ipam.Prefix?
Any other suggestion/consideration before starting?

@ChrisDeh
Copy link
Author

ChrisDeh commented Dec 7, 2021

@chadell I sadly not managed to find any time for starting with this. I've planned to go ahead with this in the second half of december.

@johannwagner
Copy link
Contributor

I am a colleague of @ChrisDeh and will take care of this 👌🏻

glennmatthews added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2022
timizuoebideri1 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2022
@bryanculver bryanculver added this to the v1.3.0 milestone Mar 3, 2022
@bryanculver
Copy link
Member

Merged into next.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 7, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new or enhanced functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants