Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI(build-build-tools-image): Do not cancel concurrent workflows #7226

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

bayandin
Copy link
Member

Problem

build-build-tools-image workflow is designed to be run only in one example per the whole repository. Currently, the job gets cancelled if a newer one is scheduled, here's an example: https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/8419610607

Summary of changes

  • Explicitly set cancel-in-progress: false for all jobs that aren't supposed to be cancelled

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
  • Do we need to implement analytics? if so did you add the relevant metrics to the dashboard?
  • If this PR requires public announcement, mark it with /release-notes label and add several sentences in this section.

Checklist before merging

  • Do not forget to reformat commit message to not include the above checklist

Copy link

2718 tests run: 2580 passed, 0 failed, 138 skipped (full report)


Code coverage* (full report)

  • functions: 28.1% (6284 of 22345 functions)
  • lines: 47.0% (44212 of 94108 lines)

* collected from Rust tests only


The comment gets automatically updated with the latest test results
a014afe at 2024-03-25T14:04:39.665Z :recycle:

@bayandin bayandin requested a review from jcsp April 11, 2024 13:48
@bayandin bayandin merged commit 99a56b5 into main Apr 11, 2024
56 checks passed
@bayandin bayandin deleted the bayandin/ci-stuff branch April 11, 2024 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants