Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0015] Cryptoeconomics for the Nervos Common Knowledge Base #78

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Mar 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

knwang
Copy link
Contributor

@knwang knwang commented Mar 8, 2019

Everyone,

This is a RFC(Request for Comments) for the Cryptoeconomic Design of the Nervos Common Knowledge Base.
Feedback or general comments are welcome.

@doitian doitian changed the title Cryptoeconomics for the Nervos Common Knowledge Base [0015] Cryptoeconomics for the Nervos Common Knowledge Base Mar 12, 2019

## 5. Decentralization and the Need for Bounded State

Like other long term store of value systems, a Store of Assets platform has to be neutral and free of risks of censorship and confiscation. These are the properties that made gold the world's favorite the store of value for thousands of years. For open, permission-less blockchain networks, censorship resistance comes down to having the broadest consensus scope with a low barrier for consensus and full node participation. Compared to payment networks, running a full node for a smart contract system is more resource intensive. Therefore a Store of Assets platform must take measures to protect the operating cost of full nodes to keep the network sufficiently decentralized.
Copy link
Contributor

@mingrui mingrui Mar 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I somewhat agree with gold is neutral, but don't agree with gold being free of risks of censorship and confiscation. For example gold was easily confiscated during the Holocaust. It's more convincing to argue that gold is valuable because it is durable, scarce, divisible, uniform, transportable(under normal circumstances), all these properties which Bitcoin also has.

Copy link
Contributor

@mingrui mingrui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussion of gold is problematic.

@doitian doitian requested a review from janx March 15, 2019 15:19
@doitian doitian requested a review from a team March 15, 2019 15:19
@doitian doitian added the s:waiting-on-reviewers Status: Waiting for Review label Mar 15, 2019
@janx janx merged commit c123c72 into master Mar 28, 2019
@doitian doitian mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2019
@doitian doitian deleted the 0015-crypto branch March 28, 2019 04:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
s:waiting-on-reviewers Status: Waiting for Review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants