-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 357
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use MAKE variable to pass correct info to child. #2396
Conversation
Spawning a make subprocess should be done through use of the `$(MAKE)` variable so that the child process receives all the information it needs.
Point of discussion: This syntax doesn't seem to sit well with
I have tried any combination of unqouted, quoted, bracket quoted, single
Is it possible for the |
@jougs and I had a long discussion some time ago, that this should probably not be a cmake target at all. The concept of "nodoc" should be a flag that can be set. This would reduce the complexity of the issue a lot. We wrote this down in an issue, but never got around to working on this, also I seem to be unable to find the issue that I have in mind :-/ … does anyone reading this remember the discussion? @gtrensch maybe? |
We discussed this in issue #1905. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well it breaks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving.
Spawning a make subprocess should be done through use of the
$(MAKE)
variable so that the child process receives all the information it needs. closes #2395. I didn't check the whole list ofmake
targets, but more could be affected.