New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update documentation for iaf_psc_exp
#3084
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
iaf_psc_exp
iaf_psc_exp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ackurth This looks quite good already, but see my inline comments. I would also like to ask for a slight re-ordering of material that you have not touched:
- Move the last paragraph before the Parameters section ("For conversion ...") before the note on the time constants.
- Put the material on the two different ways in which the model can handle input into a note as well.
/* BeginUserDocs: neuron, integrate-and-fire, current-based | ||
|
||
Short description | ||
+++++++++++++++++ | ||
|
||
Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model with exponential PSCs | ||
Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model with exponential shaped input currents. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model with exponential shaped input currents. | |
Leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model with exponential-shaped input currents |
* a hard threshold, | ||
* a fixed refractory period, | ||
* no adaptation mechanisms, | ||
* exponential shaped synaptic input currents according to [1]_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* exponential shaped synaptic input currents according to [1]_ | |
* exponential-shaped synaptic input currents according to [1]_. |
|
||
.. math:: | ||
|
||
i_{\text{syn, X}}(t) = e^{-\frac{t}{\tau_{\text{syn, X}}}} \Theta(t) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would include the weight w
here and in the following equations to ensure that units work out, in the same corresponding way as for iaf_psc_delta
.
``tau_syn_ex`` 2 ms :math:`\tau_{\text{syn, ex}}` Rise time of the excitatory synaptic alpha function | ||
``tau_syn_in`` 2 ms :math:`\tau_{\text{syn, in}}` Rise time of the inhibitory synaptic alpha function | ||
``I_e`` 0 pA :math:`I_\text{e}` Constant input current | ||
``V_min`` :math:`-\infty` mV :math:`V_{\text{min}}` Absolute lower value for the membrane potential |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit surprising, but iaf_psc_exp
does not seem to have V_min
. Adding it would be a different issue.
``V_min`` :math:`-\infty` mV :math:`V_{\text{min}}` Absolute lower value for the membrane potential |
By default, :math:`V_\text{m}` is not bounded from below. To limit | ||
hyperpolarization to biophysically plausible values, set parameter | ||
:math:`V_{\text{min}}` as lower bound of :math:`V_\text{m}`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
iaf_psc_exp
does not seem to have this ...
By default, :math:`V_\text{m}` is not bounded from below. To limit | |
hyperpolarization to biophysically plausible values, set parameter | |
:math:`V_{\text{min}}` as lower bound of :math:`V_\text{m}`. |
Here is link to output on Read the Docs: https://nest-simulator--3084.org.readthedocs.build/en/3084/models/iaf_psc_exp.html |
@ackurth @heplesser After some discussion with David D. about models, we noticed that in the original model description, it mentions the stochastic use case - which does not appear to be in this version - is that correct?
|
No description provided.