Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Application mocking for default Rx API #269

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 30, 2020
Merged

Application mocking for default Rx API #269

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 30, 2020

Conversation

helto4real
Copy link
Collaborator

@helto4real helto4real commented Dec 29, 2020

Breaking change

Not likely, been some renaming of internal interfaces. Not likely those are used. The app interfaces are not changed.

Proposed change

Add a mock class for RxApp so we can totally mock away NetDaemon service building our apps.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the [development checklist][dev-checklist]
  • The code compiles without warnings (code quality chek)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

@helto4real helto4real merged commit 050ff3d into dev Dec 30, 2020
@helto4real helto4real deleted the rx_app_interface branch December 30, 2020 20:43
Ikcelaks pushed a commit to Ikcelaks/netdaemon that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2022
* Added RxAppMock for easy mocking

* Fix test

* Adding some convenient functions

* Better test coverage
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant