Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhacement: fix these cve #1183

Closed
nyancat18 opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

enhacement: fix these cve #1183

nyancat18 opened this issue Mar 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
information_old (Deprecated; use "doc-todo" or "needinfo" instead) Information was/is required

Comments

@nyancat18
Copy link
Contributor

https://security.archlinux.org/package/firejail

@Fred-Barclay
Copy link
Collaborator

Fred-Barclay commented Mar 31, 2017

Hi @triceratops1 I believe all of these have been fixed as of the latest release of firejail - version 0.9.44.10:

CVE-2016-10117 - was fixed in 0.9.38
CVE-2016-10118 - was fixed in 0.9.44.2 and 0.9.38.6
CVE-2016-10119 - was fixed in 0.9.38
CVE-2016-10120 - was fixed in 0.9.38
CVE-2016-10121 - was fixed in 0.9.38
CVE-2016-10122 - was fixed in 0.9.44.2
CVE-2016-10123 - was fixed in 0.9.38
CVE-2017-5180 - was fixed twice (there were two different ways to exploit this): originally in 0.9.38.8 and 0.9.44.4, and then later in 0.9.38.10 and 0.9.44.6.
CVE-2017-5206 - was fixed in 0.9.44.4
CVE-2017-5207 - was fixed in 0.9.44.4

(Side note: I was watching at the time, and CVE-2017-5207 was fixed within four hours of being reported.)

You can always check the current status of firejail, including bug fixes, from the release notes: https://firejail.wordpress.com/download-2/release-notes/)
If you want to check the status of the in-development code on GitHub, the release notes are here: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/blob/master/RELNOTES

@netblue30 Can you check this for me and verify if I'm correct or not?

@Fred-Barclay Fred-Barclay added the information_old (Deprecated; use "doc-todo" or "needinfo" instead) Information was/is required label Mar 31, 2017
@netblue30
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @Fred-Barclay. It is missing CVE-2017-5940 (Arch people are also missing it athttps://security.archlinux.org/package/firejail).

It was fixed in 0.9.38.10 and 0.9.44.6. This is the second part for the incomplete fix in CVE-2017-5180. Most CVEs were published and numbers assigned after the release with the fix was out. The release notes in the package reflect the correct numbers after one more release. Anyway, I'll keep an up to date list here: https://firejail.wordpress.com/download-2/cve-status/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
information_old (Deprecated; use "doc-todo" or "needinfo" instead) Information was/is required
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants